GayLawNet® "Exclusive" Sponsorship Offer
Your banner appears exclusively here
or on the page/s of your choice

Laws

EUROPEAN UNION

The European Union is not a sovereign state
The decisions and policies of the Union do affect the GLBTI community

Limited information only available for these topics

Access to Children
Adoption of Children
Age of Consent
Anti-Vilification
Artifical Insemination
Assisted Reproduction
Asylum / Refugees
Civil Unions
  Custody of Children
Discrimination
Fostering Children
Gender Identity
Harassment
Hate Crimes
HIV/Aids
  Homosexuality
Immigration
Inheritance
In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF)
Marriage
Migration
Military
  Partners
Parenting
Property
Sodomy
Surrogacy
Transgender, Transsexual
Violence
Wrongful Death

Please read the Disclaimer

Member states of the European Union are: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom

Age of Consent Legislation/Cases/References
1.

Courts & Tribunals

On 07 October 1997, the European Commission on Human Rights said that Britain's unequal age of consent violates European law and referred a case brought by gay-youth activist Euan Sutherland to the European Court of Human Rights for a final ruling [R1.1].

The cases of Euan Sutherland and Chris Morris have been stayed pending parliamentary consideration of the Sexual Offences (Amendment) Bill [R1.2].

R1.1 IGLHRC: 1997 Year in Review 02 JAN 98
Melbourne Star Observer: Euro Court Supports Gays EU 17 OCT 97
R1.2 Home Office Press Statement: Sexual Offences (Amendment) Bill Will Return to Parliament 23 JUL 99
Assisted Reproduction Technology
Artificial Insemination, In Vitro Fertilisation, Surrogacy
Legislation/Cases/References

 

   
Asylum, Immigration, Migration, Refugees Legislation/Cases/References
1.

Asylum, Refugees

In February 2009, the European Commission confirmed that there is "an obligation on Member States to grant refugee status to persons who ... are found to have a well-founded fear of persecution for reasons of membership of a particular social group, including a group based on a common characteristic of sexual orientation" [R1.1].


The European Convention on Human Rights prohibits the deportation a person who may be at risk of torture, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment [R1.2].


In September 2001, it was mooted that gay men and lesbians fleeing violence or sexual abuse could be recognised as refugees and granted asylum in the European Union under new proposals from the European Commission [R1.3].

2.

Immigration, Migration

On 10 December 2008, the European Commission adopted a report on the application of Directive 2004/38 on the right of EU citizens and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of and a right of permanent residence after five years in the Member States [R2.1].


On 22 September 2003, under new rules endorsed by ministers, unmarried or same-sex partners of European Union citizens would be able to accompany their partners more easily to travel or live within the 15-nation bloc [R2.2].

The rules need to be endorsed also by the European Parliament to become binding legislation [R2.2].


On 09 April 2003, the European Parliament backed a non-binding resolution giving non-EU nationals the right to bring spouses, parents, registered and unmarried partners, into the EU - irrespective of gender [R2.3].


In January 2000, under the European Convention on Human Rights, to be incorporated into British law in October, surrogate children may granted citizenship as they have the right to a family life with their parents, regardless of the parents' sexuality [R2.4].

Courts & Tribunals

On 24 January 2001, Mr. Justice Turner rejected Irishman NM's request that he be allowed to live in London with his Brazilian partner RL "as a family", ruling that the EC laws did not apply in this case since RL was not a citizen of an EC country and had no right to be treated as a family member or spouse [R2.5].

Asylum, Refugees
R1.1 PinkNews.co.uk: Gays who face persecution should be given asylum says EU 10 FEB 09
R1.2 PlanetOut Network: Dutch Official Moves to Deport Gay Iranians 08 MAR 06
R1.3 Melbourne Community Voice: Gay Men and Lesbians Could Be Recognised as Refugees 21SEP 01
Immigration, Migration
R2.1 PinkNews.co.uk: Same-sex Couples Denied EU Right to Freedom of Movement 11 DEC 08
R2.2 Reuters: Traveling Made Easier for Gay Couples 23 SEP 03
R2.2 EU Observer: More People Entitled to Family Reunification 10 APR 03
R2.4 The Independent: Gay Couple's Twins to Get Right to Stay 09 JAN 00
R2.5 Planet Out: U.K. Judge: Two Men Not a Family 24 JAN 01
Children: Access, Custody, Visitation Legislation/Cases/References
1.

Courts & Tribunals

On 21 December 1999, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that Portugal had violated Article 8 of the European Human Rights Convention and the rights to "respect for private and family life'' of a divorced father when it stripped him of parental responsibility for his nine-year-old daughter on the grounds he was homosexual and lived with another man

R1.1 Reuters: Eurocourt Rules Gays Can Care for Their Children 21 DEC 99
Civil Unions, Partners: Domestic, Registered Legislation/Cases/References
1.

Union

In January 2003, the European Parliament approved a report 277–269 asking the 15 member states to give live-in couples, including homosexuals, the same legal rights that marriages enjoy [R1.1].

In February 1997, the European Parliament adopted draft legislation that guarantees equal treatment to gays and lesbians employed by European Union institutions [R1.2].

Earlier in February 1997, the European Parliament's Legal Affairs Committee refused to extend equal benefits to gay and lesbian European Union staff who have legal partnerships in their home countries [R1.3].

In February 1994, the European Parliament recommended full equality regarding same sex couples' rights of marriage, including adoption and child education [R1.4].

2.

Courts & Tribunals

On 01 April 2008, the EU Court of Justice ruled that European Union nations that recognize same-sex unions as legal marriages must grant surviving partners the same pension rights as those given in traditional marriages [C2.1], [R2.1].

On 06 September 2007, the European Court of Justice set a legal precedent by ruling that 65 year-old Tadao Maruko, a German gay man, is entitled to a payment from his dead partner's pension [R2.2].

On 24 July 2003, the European Court of Human Rights unanimously ruled that Siegmund Karner who lost his tenancy when his partner died was the victim of unlawful discrimination [C2.2], [R2.3].

In August 1999, the government of Denmark announced it will support Swede Sven Englund's European Court of Justice case against his employer, the European Council of Ministers, which refuses to give Englund's husband spousal benefits [R2.4].

In January 1999, the European Union's highest court ruled that gay couples cannot be considered families, because homosexual unions are not defined as marriages [C2.3], [R2.5].

Cases, Judgments
C2.1 Tadao Maruko v. Versorgungswerk der deutschen Bühnen Press Release No 17/08, Case C-267/06, 01 APR 08
Tadao Maruko v. Versorgungswerk der deutschen Bühnen Judgment, Case C-267/06, 01 APR 08
C2.2 Karner v Austria Application 40016/98, 405, 24 JUL 03
C2.3 D v Council T-264/97, 28 JAN 99
References, Sources
R1.1 Expatica.com: EU Moves to Recognise Gay Marriage 11 FEB 03
Zenit.org: Europarliament Favors Marital Rights for Homosexual Couples 17 JAN 03
R1.2 Capital Q: Gay Win in Euro Parliament 28 FEB 97
R1.3 Melbourne Star Observer: EU Rejects Benefits 14 FEB 97
R1.4 ILGA: The International Lesbian and Gay Association (ILGA) Celebrates 21 Years of Existence: 18 AUG 99
R2.1 The Advocate: EU Court Grants Pension Rights to Partners in Same-Sex Unions 03 APR 08
PinkNews.co.uk: Pension Victory for Same-sex Partners at Euro Court 01 APR 08
R2.2 MCV: EU Rule on Gay Partner's Pension 13 SEP 07
R2.3 Gay.com UK: European Court Rules in Favour of Gay Bereaved Partners 25 JUL 03
R2.4 Capital Q: Danes Support Partner Rights 13 AUG 99
R2.5 ABC OnLine News: EU Rules Gay Couples Can't Be Considered A Family 29 JAN 99
Discrimination Legislation/Cases/References
1.

Union

On 01 December 2009, the European Union's Treaty of Lisbon came into force incorporating the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, the only international governmental document that bans discrimination based on sexual orientation [R1.1].

The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, Article 21 states,

"1. Any discrimination based on any ground such as sex, race, colour, ethnic or social origin, genetic features, language, religion or belief, political or any other opinion, membership of a national minority, property, birth, disability, age or sexual orientation shall be prohibited" [R1.1].


On 10 February 2010, the European Parliament confirmed that candidate countries wishing to join the European Union have to provide genuine protection to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender minorities [R1.2].


On 02 April 2009, the European Parliament today voted to extend anti-discrimination protections beyond employment to cover goods, facilities and services [R1.3].


In March 2009, the European Parliament's Civil Liberties Committee approved a report recommending the extension of protection against LGBT discrimination [R1.4].


In September 2008, Members of the European Parliament gave their support to a new EU directive on discrimination in goods and services [R1.5].


On 02 July 2008, the European Commission adopted a proposal for a directive which provides for protection from direct or indirect discrimination on grounds of age, disability, sexual orientation and religion or belief the areas of social protection, including housing, social security and health care, education and access to and supply of goods and services [R1.6].


In June 2008, the European Commission announced that disability, sexual orientation, religion or belief and age will be included in a new directive on discrimination [R1.7].


In September 2001, the European Parliament and the European Commission declared that prospective members of the European Union must abolish anti-gay laws before they will be allowed to join [R1.8].


In October 2000, ILGA successfully lobbied for the inclusion of an anti-discrimination directive by the Economic Union [R1.9].


In September 2000, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe voted overwhelmingly in favour of a sweeping series of recommendations in support of lesbian and gay rights [R1.10].


In March 2000, The European Union's parliament has adopted a resolution urging the 15 EU nations to "guarantee one-parent families, unmarried couples and same-sex couples rights equal to those enjoyed by traditional couples and families, particularly as regards tax law, pecuniary rights and social rights'' [R1.11].


In March 2000, European parliamentarians voted to recommend that sexual orientation be added to the list of prohibited grounds of discrimination in a move to strengthen anti-discrimination measures in the European Convention on Human Rights [R1.12].


European Union directive number 78/2000/EC deals with discrimination in employment and occupation, requiring national legislation to make provision to the effect that gay men and lesbians who are discriminated against or harassed at the workplace are granted a legal remedy [R1.13].


On 17 December 1998, the European Parliament adopted its report and resolution on respect for human rights in the European Union for the year 1997 [R1.14].


In July 1998, the European Gay & Lesbian Sport Federation (EGLSF) was astonished to read the decision by ISU (International Skating Union) to put skaters who insist in participating at the Amsterdam Gay Games, on a so-called blacklist for the rest of their life, contrary to the spirit of the European Fair Play Declaration as issued by the Council of Europe [R1.15].


On 17 September 1998, the European Parliament adopted with a majority of 110 against 89 votes (6 abstentions) a resolution reaffirming the Parliament's defence of the human rights of gays and lesbians [R1.16].


In July 1997, The European Council approved a treaty that endorses banning discrimination based on sexual orientation. The relevant article reads as follows

"Without prejudice to the other provisions of this Treaty and within the limits of the powers conferred by it upon the Community, the Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament, may take appropriate action to combat discrimination based on sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation" [R1.17].

Previously:

In October 1996, lobbying was underway for the inclusion of an anti-discrimination clause covering sexual preference in a new revision of the Maastricht Treaty [R1.18].

In October 1996, the European Parliament adopted a resolution on human rights stating, in part: "[A]ll discrimination and/or inequality of treatment must be abolished concerning homosexuals, especially ... differences that persist on the age of consent for homosexuals and discrimination concerning the right to work, and in penal, civil, contractual, social and economic law" [R1.19].

In October 1995, ILGA's Co Secretary Inge Wallaert spoke at a public hearing of the European Parliament to demand that the Parliament recognise the fundamental rights of lesbians and gay men within the European union. She asked the Intergovernmental Conference in 1996 to include sexual orientation within an anti discrimination clause in a new European Treaty [R1.20].

On October 1st, 1981, the Council of Europe recognized and proclaimed for the first time in history to right to sexual autodetermination and called for the end of all forms of discrimination against homosexuals [R1.21].

2.

Courts & Tribunals

On 17 February 1998, the European Court of Justice ruled against a UK lesbian who sued her employers, South West Trains, for the right to equal pay with heterosexuals, including a free travel pass for her partner. The Court rejected a claim that such discrimination was sex discrimination contrary to Article 119 of the Treaty of Rome, which provides for "equal pay ... without discrimination based on sex". The ruling means the end of attempts to establish through the courts that discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation is a form of sex discrimination [R2.1].

In October 1997, a preliminary European Court of Justice ruling in a British lesbian's dispute with her employer was set to result in Europe-wide protection for gay and lesbian workers and make it unlawful throughout the European Union for employers to treat employees differently because of the gender of their domestic partner [R2.2].

R1.1 PinkPaper.com: EU treaty is first to ban discrimination against gays 08 DEC 09
R1.2 UK Gay News: Euro Parliament Reaffirms Gay Rights Are Condition to Join the European Union 10 FEB 10
R1.3 PinkNews.co.uk: European Parliament opts to extend anti-discrimination legislation 02 APR 09
R1.4 PinkNews.co.uk: European Parliament approves extension of LGBT discrimination protection 17 MAR 09
R1.5 PinkNews.co.uk: MEPs Debate Anti-discrimination Proposals 02 SEP 08
R1.6 PinkNews.co.uk: European Commission Releases Discrimination Directive Proposal 02 JUL 08
R1.7 PinkNews.co.uk: EU Will Include Sexual Orientation in Discrimination Directive 13 JUN 08
R1.8 Gay.com: Prospective Members of EU Must Abolish Anti-Gay Laws 15 SEP 01
R1.9 Sydney Star Observer: EU Endorses Anti-Discrimination 26 OCT 00
R1.10 Melbourne Star Observer: Council of Europe Adopts Gay Rights 29 SEP 00
R1.11 Associated Press: EU Urges Gay Couple Equal Rights 17 MAR 00
R1.12 Queensland Pride: Europe to Ban Discrimination MAR 00
R1.13 Malta Gay Rights Movement: Gays Criticise Bill on Employment Relations 08 AUG 02
R1.14 ILGA-Europe Euro-Letter No 66: European Parliament Reaffirms Gay and Lesbian Rights as Human Rights DEC 98
R1.15 Euro-Queer Digest: Skaters: Wear Mask at Gay Games! 22 JUL 98
R1.16 ILGA-Europe: EU Parliament Equal Rights Resolution 18 SEP 98
R1.17 Capital Q: EC Approves Gay Rights 04 JUL 97
R1.18 Melbourne Star Observer: Move In Europe 25 OCT 96
R1.19 Capital Q: Euro Parliament Defends Gays 11 OCT 96
R1.20 ILGA: Annual Report - Part 1 96
R1.21 ILGA: The International Lesbian and Gay Association (ILGA) Celebrates 21 Years of Existence: 18 AUG 99
R2.1 Melbourne Star Observer: Lesbian Couple Lose Fight for Equal Pay 20 FEB 98
IGLHRC: IGLHRC Celebrates the 50th anniversary of the UDHR 10 DEC 98
R2.2 Capital Q: Europe-wide Protection 10 OCT 97
Gender Identity, Intersex,
Transgender, Transexual

[?]
Legislation/Cases/References
1.

Courts & Tribunals

In January 2009, the European Court of Human Rights ruled a 72-year old transsexual be reimbursed after her country's health insurance refused to pay the cost of her gender reassignment treatment [R1.1].


In April 2008, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that Lithuania must implement new legislation on gender reassignment or pay damages and that the Court would not re-examine the case of a Lithuanian transsexual who won an order that blocking gender reassignment treatment was a violation of Article 8 (right to respect for private life) of the European Convention on Human Rights [R1.2].


In July 2002, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found unanimously that the United Kingdom was in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights articles ("right to private life" and "enjoying the fundamental right to marry") for failing to legally recognise transsexual Christine Goodwin as a woman, despite here having undergone gender reassignment [R1.3].


In August 1999, it was reported that the European Court of Justice had recently ruled that it was unlawful to discriminate against transsexuals [R1.4].


In July 1998, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the (UK) Government had not breached the rights of Kristina Sheffield and Rachel Horsham, both 52, by denying them new birth certificates showing that they were female. The court also upheld, by 18 votes to two, the Government's right to prevent Miss Sheffield and Miss Horsham from marrying men. It ruled that marriage may legitimately be restricted under national laws to a union between a man and a woman "of biological origin" [R1.5].


In June 1996, the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg (not to be confused with the European Court of Human Rights, in Strasbourg) ruled that an English University, Cornwall College in Redruth, breached the non-discrimination provisions of the European Council's Equal Treatment Directive (1976) when it dismissed a British transsexual, known only as "P", in 1992 [R1.5].

R1.2 PinkNews.co.uk: Euro Court Will Not Re-open Trans Case 09 APR 08
R1.3 Sydney Star Observer: Europe Upholds Rights 18 JUL 02
R1.4 Daily Telegraph: Sex-change Soldiers Can Stay in Army 02 AUG 99
R1.5 The Telegraph: Transsexuals Lose Euro Court Fight 31 JUL 98
Adelaide Gay Times: Transsexuals Still Considered Males 06 MAR 98
R1.6 Brother Sister: Britain Breached EU Conditions 27 JUN 96
Homosexuality, Sodomy Legislation/Cases/References
1.

Union

In July 1998, the Council of Europe strongly criticised Romania's parliament after it rejected a government proposal to decriminalise gay sex which would have brought it into line with standards throughout Europe [R1.2].

In May 1998, the European Union welcomed proposed changes to Romania's criminal code that would provide equal treatment for homosexuals and heterosexuals in cases of rape and underage sex [R1.3].

In October 1996, following an outcry from European officials, Romania's Chamber of Deputies deleted a section of an already-passed Bill that would have punished private gay sex between adults with up to three years probation. But the chamber has decided to retain a section that will punish gay sex which causes "public scandal" with up to five years in prison and another section that bans gay "propaganda, associations or ... proselytising" under threat of five years in jail [R1.4].

In October 1996, the European Parliament was "shocked" by Romanian proposals to impose tougher sanctions on gay sex. European Union legislators urged Romanian President Ion Iliescu to intervene and prevent the law being changed [R1.5].

2.

Courts & Tribunals

On 31 July 2000, The European Court of Human Rights found that man's 1996 conviction was a violation of Article 8 ("right to respect for private and family life") of the European Convention on Human Rights and ordered Britain to pay the man US$50,000 in costs and damages for convicting him under legislation that outlaws gay group sex [C2.1], [R2.1].

On 30 November 1999, a British homosexual convicted for sex sessions at his home with several other men put his case to the European Court of Human Rights, arguing that his right to privacy had been breached [R2.2].


On 19 February 1997, three British gay men who were imprisoned for engaging in consensual sado-masochistic sex in their own homes lost their appeal to the European Court of Human Rights which held that "the state was unquestionably entitled to regulate the infliction of physical harm through the criminal law. The determination of the tolerable level of harm where the victim consented was primarily a matter for the state's authorities" [R2.3].

On 21 October 1996, the European Court of Human Rights heard the case of three British gay men who were convicted and jailed for consensual sadomasochistic sex in 1990 [R2.4].


On 22 April 1993, the European Court of Human Rights ruled in Modinos v. Cyprus [C2.2] that gay-male sex bans violate Article 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms [R2.5].

Cases, Judgments
C2.1 A.D.T. v. The United Kingdom 559, 31 JUL 00
C2.2 Modinos v. Cyprus 15070/89, 22 APR 93
References, Sources
R1.2 Brother Sister: Homosexuals "Sterile"" 09 JUL 98
R1.3 Sydney Star Observer: Romanian Proposal 28 MAY 98
R1.4 Melbourne Star Observer: Romania Backs down on Bill 04 OCT 96
R1.5 New Zealand "express": Sex Sanctions 10 OCT 96
R2.1 Associated Press: Euro Court Nixes British Gay Law 31 JUL 00
R2.2 Reuters: Rights Court Hears Gay Briton's Plea on Private Sex 30 NOV 99
R2.3 Capital Q: Sado-Masochists Lose Appeal 28 FEB 97
R2.4 Brother Sister: A Spanner in the British Courts 31 OCT 96
R2.5 Capital Q: Cypriot Plea for Gay Sex 21 NOV 97
Inheritance Legislation/Cases/References
1.

Courts & Tribunals

In April 2008, the European Court of Human Rights in a 15–2 vote, ruled two elderly British sisters (the Burdens) were not victims of discrimination and the absence of a legally-binding agreement between them, rendered their relationship of co-habitation, despite its long duration, fundamentally different to that of a married or civil partnership couple, disentitling them to an exemption from inheritance tax [R1.1].

R1.1 PinkNews.co.uk: Euro Court: Sisters Can Not Have the Same Tax Benefits as Civil Partners 29 APR 08
Marriage Legislation/Cases/References
1.

Union

In January 2009, the European Parliament voted 401 – 220 in favour of a report which calls for same-sex marriage and civil unions to be recognised across all EU states [R1.1].


On 04 September 2003, in issuing its annual report on human rights issues to the European Union, the European Parliament recommended that gay men and lesbians be allowed to legally marry and adopt children [R1.2].

2.

Courts & Tribunals

On 25 February 2010, the European Court of Human Rights held a Chamber hearing on the admissibility and merits in the case of Schalk and Kopf v. Austria [R2.1].

R1.1 Southern Star: Gay Marriage to Unite Europe 22 JAN 09
R1.2 The Advocate: European Parliament Backs Gay Marriage 05 SEP 03
R2.1 CodexOnline: Schalk and Kopf v. Austria: Chamber Hearing 26 FEB 10
European Court of Human Rights: Schalk and Kopf v. Austria: Press release issued by the Registrar Word 30.5kb, 25 FEB 10
European Court of Human Rights: Schalk and Kopf v. Austria: Statement of Facts and Complaints 16 FEB 10
Military Legislation/Cases/References
1.

Courts & Tribunals

In October 2002, the European Court of Human Rights has ordered Britain to pay € 590,000 compensation to five people who were discharged from the army because they were homosexual, finding that the applicants - four men and a woman - had suffered "a violation of their right to a private life", upheld by Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights [R1.1].

In July 2000, the European Court of Human Rights awarded £19,000 compensation for each of four homosexual people who were discharged from the armed forces in the UK [R1.2].

In January 2000, an Edinburgh employment tribunal ruled that discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation did not constitute sexual discrimination and rejected former Flight Lieutenant Roderick Macdonald's sex discrimination and sex harassment claim relating to the nature of the investigatory interview, as a lesbian would have been treated in the same way [R1.3].

On 27 September 1999, the European Court ruled that the (UK) Ministry of Defence had violated the European Convention on Human Rights by enforcing the forces' ban on homosexuals and was a breach of their privacy rights [C1.1], [R1.4].

In June 1999, the Council of Europe ordered the Cypriot Defence Ministry to pay damages to a Greek Cypriot homosexual whose rights were violated by the law outlawing homosexuality between consenting male adults that was amended in May 1998 [R1.5].

On 18 May 1999, at the full hearing of the case of Smith v MoD before the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, the British Government admitted that it was difficult to provide any good reason for maintaining its policy of banning lesbians and gay men from serving in the armed forces [R1.6].

In June 1997, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the British government had a case to answer in the challenge to its military gay ban brought by four homosexuals who were kicked out of the services [R1.7].

In March 1997, the case of Terry Perkins, a gay man who was dismissed from the Navy on grounds of his sexuality in November 1995, was referred to the European Court of Justice for a ruling [R1.8]. High Court Justice Lightman "reluctantly" withdrew the reference after deciding that the European legislation applied only to discrimination against men and women on grounds of gender [R1.9].

Cases, Judgments
C1.1 Lustig-Prean & Beckett v. The United Kingdom and Smith and Grady v. The United Kingdom 27 SEP 99
References, Sources
R1.1 Cape Times: UK to Pay Damages to Sacked Gay Soldiers 23 OCT 02
R1.2 Sydney Star Observer: Compensation for Sacked Service People 27 JUL 00
R1.3 The Scotsman: Gay Former RAF Officer Loses Claim for Dismissal 14 JAN 00
R1.4 Electronic Telegraph: £4m Payout for Gays Sacked from Services 17 OCT 99
The Times: Ban on Homosexuals in Forces to Go Next Year 15 OCT 99
Registry of the European Court of Human Rights: European Court of Human Rights Press Release Issued by the Registrar 27 SEP 99
Teletext UK: Gays Ban Breach of Human Rights 27 SEP 99
R1.5 Cyprus Mail: Defence Ministry Told to Pay Damages to Gay Man 04 JUL 99
R1.6 Stonewall News Release: MoD Admits No Good Reason for Military Gay Ban 18 MAY 99
R1.7 BBC Online: Army Gay Ban 'Could be Lifted' 27 FEB 99
Capital Q: Military in Euro Courts 20 JUN 97
R1.8 Melbourne Star Observer: Navy Discrimination Case 21 MAR 97
Sydney Star Observer: Fresh Defence Ban Challenge 13 FEB 97
R1.9 Yahoo! U.K. & Ireland: Forces Homosexual Ban 'Faces Uncertain Future' 13 JUL 98
Parenting: Adoption, Fostering Legislation/Cases/References
1.

Courts & Tribunals

On 26 February 2002, the European Court of Human Rights ruled authorities in Europe can turn down applications by homosexual men and women to adopt children on the basis of the adult's sexuality, upholding a decision by French authorities to refuse to let Philippe Frette, a single gay man, adopt a child [R1.1].

Previously:

In October 2000, the European Court of Human Rights was expected to find (in 2001) that France breached the human rights of Philippe Frette, a 46-year-old teacher from Paris, who claimed he was denied the opportunity to adopt solely on the basis of his sexuality [R1.2].


On 21 December 1999, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that Portugal had violated Article 8 of the European Human Rights Convention and the rights to "respect for private and family life'' of a divorced father when it stripped him of parental responsibility for his nine-year-old daughter on the grounds he was homosexual and lived with another man [R1.3].

R1.1 Reuters: Euro Court Says Not Illegal to Refuse Gay Adoption 26 FEB 02
R1.2 The Guardian: Adoption Drive Targets More Gay Parents 01 OCT 00
R1.3 Reuters: Eurocourt Rules Gays Can Care for Their Children 21 DEC 99
Property Legislation/Cases/References
   

 

   
Violence Legislation/Cases/References
   
   

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional

Credit Counseling - Arizona Landscaping - Debt Consolidation - Renegade Motorhomes