GayLawNet® "Exclusive" Sponsorship of this page IS available

Laws

United States of America

ALASKA

Limited information only available for these topics

Access to Children
Adoption of Children
Age of Consent
Anti-Vilification
Artifical Insemination
Assisted Reproduction
Asylum / Refugees
  Civil Unions
Custody of Children
Discrimination
Fostering Children
Gender Identity
Harassment
Hate Crimes
  HIV/Aids
Homosexuality
Inheritance
In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF)
Marriage
Military
Parenting
  Partners
Property
Sodomy
Taxation
Transgender, Transsexual
Violence
Wrongful Death

Please read the Disclaimer

Age of Consent Legislation/Cases/References
1.

State

Alaska Statutes, Title 11. Criminal Law, Chapter 41 Offences against the person –

Section 434. Sexual Abuse of a minor in the first degree [L1.2]

"(a) An offender commits the crime of sexual abuse of a minor in the first degree if

(1) being 16 years of age or older, the offender engages in sexual penetration with a person who is under 13 years of age or aids, induces, causes, or encourages a person who is under 13 years of age to engage in sexual penetration with another person;

(2) being 18 years of age or older, the offender engages in sexual penetration with a person who is under 18 years of age, and the offender is the victim's natural parent, stepparent, adopted parent, or legal guardian; or

(3) being 18 years of age or older, the offender engages in sexual penetration with a person who is under 16 years of age, and

(A) the victim at the time of the offense is residing in the same household as the offender and the offender has authority over the victim; or
(B) the offender occupies a position of authority in relation to the victim.

(b) Sexual abuse of a minor in the first degree is an unclassified felony and is punishable as provided in AS 12.55".

Section 436. Sexual Abuse of a Minor in the Second Degree [L1.1]

"(a) An offender commits the crime of sexual abuse of a minor in the second degree if

(1) being 17 years of age or older, the offender engages in sexual penetration with a person who is 13, 14, or 15 years of age and at least four years younger than the offender, or aids, induces, causes or encourages a person who is 13, 14, or 15 years of age and at least four years younger than the offender to engage in sexual penetration with another person;

(2) being 16 years of age or older, the offender engages in sexual contact with a person who is under 13 years of age or aids, induces, causes, or encourages a person under 13 years of age to engage in sexual contact with another person;

(3) being 18 years of age or older, the offender engages in sexual contact with a person who is under 18 years of age, and the offender is the victim's natural parent, stepparent, adopted parent, or legal guardian;

(4) being 16 years of age or older, the offender aids, induces, causes, or encourages a person who is under 16 years of age to engage in conduct described in AS 11.41.455 (a)(2) - (6);

(5) being 18 years of age or older, the offender engages in sexual contact with a person who is under 16 years of age, and

(A) the victim at the time of the offense is residing in the same household as the offender and the offender has authority over the victim; or

(B) the offender occupies a position of authority in relation to the victim.

(6) being 18 years of age or older, the offender engages in sexual penetration with a person who is 16 or 17 years of age and at least three years younger than the offender, and the offender occupies a position of authority in relation to the victim; or

(7) being under 16 years of age, the offender engages in sexual penetration with a person who is under 13 years of age and at least three years younger than the offender.

(b) Sexual abuse of a minor in the second degree is a class B felony.

See also:

Section 438. Sexual Abuse of a Minor in the Third Degree

Section 440. Sexual Abuse of a Minor in the Fourth Degree

L1.2 AS 11.41.434: Sexual Abuse of a Minor in the First Degree (accessed 06 JUN 09)
L1.1 AS 11.41.436: Sexual Abuse of a Minor in the Second Degree (accessed 06 JUN 09)
Civil Unions, Partners: Domestic, Registered Legislation/Cases/References
1.

State

There is no State law or municipal ordinance extending benefits to domestic partners in Alaska.

2.

Courts & Tribunals

On 28 October 2005, in a unanimous decision, the Alaska supreme court ruled that it is unconstitutional for the state to continue to deny equal benefits to the domestic partners of lesbian and gay state employees and retirees [C1.4], [R1.3].

Previously:

On 22 May 2002, the Alaska Civil Liberties Union appealed a lawsuit to the state Supreme Court in an effort to get benefits extended to gay couples working for the state or Municipality of Anchorage [R1.2].

In November 2001, Superior Court Judge Stephanie Joannides ruled that the state and municipality does not have to extend benefits to gay or lesbian couples, finding that same-sex couples are in the same legal category as unmarried heterosexual couples, and neither are entitled to benefits. [R1.1].

C1.4 Alaska Case Law Service: Alaska Civil Liberties Union v. State (No s-10459) 122 P.3d 781, 96 28 OCT 05
R1.3 The Advocate: Alaska Court Orders Equality for Gay Couples 29 OCT 05
R1.2 Anchorage Daily News: ACLU Appeals Gay Benefits Case to Supreme Court 23 MAY 02
R1.1 Anchorage Daily News: City, State Win Same-Sex Benefits Case 18 NOV 01
Discrimination Legislation/Cases/References
See also: [GENDER IDENTITY]
1.

State

Alaska does not have a state-wide law prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation.

2.

Cities & Towns

On 03 April 2012, with 102 of 121 precincts counted, 58% of voters in Anchorage appear to have rejected a ballot measure that sought to add “sexual orientation” and “transgender identity” to the city’s human rights law [R2.5].

The ballot measure asked voters: “Shall the current Municipal Code sections providing legal protections against discrimination on the basis of race, color, sex, religion, national origin, marital status, age, physical disability, and mental disability be amended to include protections on the basis of sexual orientation or transgender identity?”

Previously:

On 03 April 2012, Anchorage residents will vote on a proposed ordinance to add "sexual orientation or transgender identity" to the city's anti-discrimination code (Equal Rights Ordinance) [R2.4].

On 08 December 2011, volunteers submitted 13,515 signatures of Anchorage registered voters – 5,871 valid signatures required – in support of a city election ballot initiative to extend legal protections against discrimination to gay and transgender people in Anchorage [R2.3].

On 11 August 2009, the Anchorage assembly passed an ordinance that bans discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity [R2.2] however, Mayor Dan Sullivan vetoed the non-discrimination ordinance [R2.1].

3.

Courts & Tribunals

In January 1999, Judge Diarmuid O'Scannlain of Portland, writing for the 2-1 majority of the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a landlord may refuse to rent to an unmarried couple if doing so would violate his or her religious scruples. The decision would be applicable in nine western states that fall under the 9th Circuit's jurisdiction unless overturned by the full appeals court [R3.1].

R2.5 Keen News Service: Anchorage rejects anti-bias measure 04 APR 12
R2.4 Anchorage Daily News: If Proposition 5 passes, complaints will go to committee 25 MAR 12
R2.3 Anchorage Daily News: Gay rights initiative likely headed to ballot 09 DEC 11
R2.2 The Advocate: Anchorage Passes Antidiscrimination Ordinance 12 AUG 09
R2.1 The Advocate: Override of Anchorage Veto Unlikely 27 AUG 09
The Advocate: Anchorage Mayor Vetoes LGBT Ordinance 18 AUG 09
R3.1 Los Angeles Times: Unwed couple lose tenant fight 15 JAN 99

GayLawNet® "Exclusive" Sponsorship of this page IS available
Gender Identity, Intersex,
Transgender, Transexual

[?]
Legislation/Cases/References
See also: [DISCRIMINATION]
1.

State

On 12 July 2012, Lt. Governor Mead Treadwell signed a new Alaska Department of Motor Vehicles regulation that, effective 11 August, makes it easier for transgender citizens to change their sex identifier on state ID cards [R1.1].

2.

Courts & Tribunals

On 12 March, Judge Michael Spaan in the Superior Court ordered the state's Division of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to adopt a regulation establishing a procedure for changing the sex designation on a driver's license [R2.1].

R1.1 Online Public Notice: Notice Of Adopted Changes To Regulations Of The Department Of Administration, Division Of Motor Vehicles 26 JUL 12
ACLU: Transgender Alaskans can change sex on licenses easier under new DMV rule 26 JUL 12
R2.1 GayCityNews: Alaska DMV Must Allow Sex Designation Change 25 APR 12
Hate Crimes Legislation/Cases/References
1.

State

Hate crimes law in Alaska does not include sexual orientation.

2.

Courts & Tribunals

On 19 May 2000, despite inflicting 27 stab wounds, a Superior Court jury acquitted Kenneth J. Washington, a 22-year-old man who claimed he was defending himself against a sexual assailant when last year he stabbed to death Alexander Paul Nicholai, a 45-year-old man [R2.1].

R2.1 Anchorage Daily News: Jury Backs Killer 20 MAY 00
Homosexuality, Sodomy Legislation/Cases/References
1.

State

In 1980, Alaska repealed the law prohibiting consensual sex between same-sex couples.

R1.1 ILGA: State-Sponsored Homophobia PDF at page 48, 700.06kb, MAY 09
Marriage Legislation/Cases/References
1.

State

In November 1998, as a consequence of the Court ruling in Brause -v- Alaska, voters ratified a State constitutional amendment [R1.4] providing –

"§ 25 Marriage

To be valid or recognized in this State, a marriage may exist only between one man and one woman" [L1.3].


In October 1998, voters were asked to change their state constitutions to prevent gays and lesbians from marrying in the 03 November ballot [R1.2].

In June 1996, Democratic Governor Tony Knowles criticised but refused to veto a bill which bans gay marriages [R1.1].

In March 1996, Senate Bill 30 passed the Senate and House, restricting marriage to opposite-sex couples and providing also that a same-sex marriage lawfully entered into elsewhere is "void in this state, and contractual rights granted by virtue of the marriage, including its termination, are unenforceable in this state".

On 28 February 1996, the Anti-Marriage House Bill 227 passed the house and restricting marriage to " … a man and a woman".

2.

Courts & Tribunals

On 22 September 1998, Judge Peter Michalski ruled that the passage of the 1998 amendment invalidated Jay Brause and Gene Dugan's claim for a marriage license. The case was dismissed [C2.2].

On 27 February 1998, Superior Court Judge Peter Michalski found that choosing a partner is a fundamental right and the state Constitution protects both the "traditional choice and the non-traditional choice" and ordered the state to show why it should be able to regulate who people marry [R2.1]..

R1.4 Associated Press: Same-Sex Marriages Banned by Voters 04 NOV 98
L1.3 The Constitution of the State of Alaska: § 25 Marriage (Accessed 21 SEP 11)
R1.2 San Francisco Chronicle: Ballot Test for Gay Marriage in Alaska, Hawaii 26 OCT 98
R1.1 New Zealand Express: Alaska Freezes Gays 20 JUN 96
C2.2 Alaska Case Law Service: Jay Brause & Gene Dugan -v- State of Alaska 21 P.3d 357, Alaska, (NO. S-9376) 17 APR 01
R2.1 Washington State Bar News: Same-Sex Marriage: The State of the Law SEP 98
Brother Sister: Alaskan Same-Sex Marriage Possible 05 MAR 98
Parenting, Adoption, Fostering Legislation/Cases/References
1.

State

There is no statutory ban preventing single gay men and lesbians adopting children in Alaska. There is no clear prohibition on joint adoption and second-parent adoption is allowed in some areas.

   
Taxation Legislation/Cases/References
1.

Courts & Tribunals

On 14 November 2012, the Alaska Supreme Court heard arguments in The State of Alaska & The Municipality of Anchorage v. Julie Schmidt, Gayle Schuh, Julie Vollick No. S-14521, an appeal from the state over an Alaska taxation policy that treats same-sex couples differently from straight couples [C1.4], [R1.3].

On 16 September 2011, Judge Frank A Pfiffner ruled that same-sex couples in Alaska qualify for the same exemptions on local property taxes as those that apply to married couples, concluding that Tax Exemption's marital classification violates the Alaska Constitution's equal protection clause [C1.2], [R1.1].

C1.4 The State of Alaska & The Municipality of Anchorage v. Julie Schmidt, Gayle Schuh, Julie Vollick S-14521
R1.3 Seattle Post Intelligencer: Court hears appeal in same-sex couples tax case 14 NOV 12
C1.2 Decision & Order: Julie A Schmidt & Others v. The State of Alaska & Anor No. 3AN-10-9519 CI PDF 1.23MB, 16 SEP 11
R1.1 Anchorage Daily News: Same-sex couples in Alaska get tax exemption, judge rules 20 SEP 11

GayLawNet® "Exclusive" Sponsorship of this page IS available