GayLawNet® "Exclusive" Sponsorship of this page IS available

Laws

United States of America

TEXAS

Limited information only available for these topics

Access to Children
Adoption of Children
Age of Consent
Anti-Vilification
Artifical Insemination
Assisted Reproduction
Bullying
Civil Unions
Custody of Children
Discrimination
Fostering Children
Gender Identity
Harassment
Hate Crimes
HIV/Aids
Homosexuality
Inheritance
In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF)
Marriage
Parenting
Partners
Privacy
Sodomy
Transgender, Transsexual
Violence
Wrongful Death

Please read the Disclaimer

Age of Consent Legislation/Cases/References
1.

State

A minor reaches the age of majority at the age of seventeen (17) years.

Texas Penal Code Title 5. Offences Against the Person, Chapter 21. Sexual Offences [L1.2]

Sec. 21.11. Indecency with a child

(a) person commits an offense if, with a child younger than 17 years and not the person ’s spouse, whether the child is of the same or opposite sex, the person:

(1) engages in sexual contact with the child or causes the child to engage in sexual contact; or [...]


A minor may petition to have the disabilities of minority removed for limited or general purposes if the minor is:

  • a resident of Texas;
  • 17 years old, or at least 16 years old and living apart from the minor's parents or guardian, and
  • is self-supporting and managing the minor's own financial affairs. Texas Family Code Chapter 31 [L1.1].
  Contributor: Helene G. Parker
L1.2 Texas Penal Code: Chapter 21. Sexual Offences
L1.1 Texas Family Code: Removal of Disabilities of Minority
Assisted Reproduction Technology
Artificial Insemination, In Vitro Fertilisation
Legislation/Cases/References
See also: [PARENTING]
1.

State

Artificial insemination and assisted reproduction procedures are available to all women [R1.1] who are married or single [L1.1].

Sec. 160.704. Consent to Assisted Reproduction. (a) Consent by a married woman to assisted reproduction must be in a record signed by the woman and her husband and kept by a licensed physician. This requirement does not apply to the donation of eggs by a married woman for assisted reproduction by another woman.

Sec. 160.754. Gestational Agreement Authorised.

(a) A prospective gestational mother, her husband if she is married, each donor, and each intended parent may enter into a written agreement providing that: [...]

(b) The intended parents must be married to each other. Each intended parent must be a party to the gestational agreement. [...]

  Contributor: Helene G. Parker
2.

Courts & Tribunals

On 10 February 2011, the Texas Court of Appeals ruled that the Harris County District Court had properly ordered the registration in Texas of a California decree involving a Houston gay male couple who were "intended parents" under a 2005 gestational surrogacy agreement, concluding also that the California decree, in the words of Chief Justice Sherry Radack, "qualifies as a child custody determination despite the absence of customary custody provisions on the face of the judgment" [C2.1], [R2.1].

C2.1 First Court of Appeals: Jerry L Berwick v Richard T Wagner No. 01-09-0834-CV PDF 201,79kb, 10 FEB 11
R2.1 Gay City News: California Surrogacy Decree Protects Both Dads, Texas Finds 22 FEB 11
L1.1 Texas Statutes: Chapter 160 (Accessed 13 JUN 09)
R1.1 Contributor: Helene G. Parker
Children: Access, Custody, Visitation Legislation/Cases/References
1.

Texas Family Code (TFC), Chapter 153, Sec. 153.001. Public Policy [L1.1]

(a) The public policy of this state is to:

(1) assure that children will have frequent and continuing contact with parents who have shown the ability to act in the best interest of the child;
(2) provide a safe, stable, and nonviolent environment for the child;
(3) encourage parents to share in the rights and duties of raising their child after the parents have separated or dissolved their marriage;

(b) A court may not render an order that conditions the right of visitation on the payment of child support.

2.

Texas does not use the term custody. It uses the term conservator.

A conservator is someone who makes the decisions for the child.

An individual may be a managing conservator or a possessory conservator:

(a) A managing conservator is someone who has actual physical possession of the child (i.e., physical custody of the child);

(b) A possessory conservator is someone who does not have actual physical possession of the child, but who has the right of visitation and access to the child;

An individual who has conservatorship may be a parent, grandparent, an agency, or a relative. To have standing to bring suit for conservatorship, the child must have resided with an individual for the preceding 6 months.
3. The standard for determining conservatorship and visitation is the best interest of the child. TFC Chapter 153.002.
4.

An individual may be a joint managing conservator or a sole managing conservator of a child. TFC Chapter 153.005;

A joint managing conservator is an individual or parent who shares parenting rights and duties with another individual or parent. When making decisions regarding the best interest of the child, the primary managing conservator is required to discuss his or her decision making with the other parent
A sole managing conservator is an individual or parent who is not required to share parenting rights and duties with another parent.
5. With very few exceptions, a sole managing or joint managing conservator may not deprive the other parent of his or her right to visit and have access to the child.
6. When determining conservatorship and visitation, the court does not discriminate on the basis of gender or marital status of the party. TFC Chapter 153.003.
7. However, if the Court finds that one parent has been convicted of domestic violence, the Court may designate the other parent as sole managing conservator.
8. It is a state jail felony for a noncustodial parent to take or retain a child in violation of the terms of the visitation order. Texas Penal Code Chapter 25.03.
9. It is state jail felony for a noncustodial parent if he or she intentionally interferes with the lawful custody of the a child and he or she knowingly entices or persuades the child to leave the custody of the custodial parent or guardian. Texas Penal Code Chapter 25.03
  Contributor: Helene G. Parker
10.

Courts & Tribunals

On 07 May 2013, Judge John Roach in the 296th District Court imposed a 'morality clause' in a custody dispute ordering that anyone who isn't related by 'blood or marriage' can't be around Carolyn Compton's children past 9 pm, effectively forcing her partner Page Price to leave the home within 30 days [C10.4], [R10.3].

On 24 June 2011, Harris County Associate Judge Charley E. Prine, Jr. issued a ruling which included an unprecedented injunction which prohibits a father from leaving his children alone with any man they aren’t related to "by blood or adoption" [R10.2].

In August 2000, in a custody suit, District Judge Bill Peek ordered that gay overnight guests were "an absolute prohibition," and he forbade any conversation with the child "about her dad's … homosexual relationship" [R10.1].

L1.1 Texas Family Code: Chapter 153. Conservatorship, Possession, and Access
C10.4 In the Matter of the Marriage of Carolyn Compton v. Joshua Shane Compton and the Interest of Taylor Madison Compton, Courtney Ranae Compton Case No. 296-54663-2010
R10.3 GayStarNews: Lesbian forced from partner, two kids by Texas judge's 'morality clause' 18 MAY 13
R10.2 The Houston Chronicle: Houston judge limits rights of gay father 22 AUG 11
R10.1 Dallas Voice: Fairness an Issue in Custody Case 01 SEP 00
Civil Unions, Partners: Domestic, Registered Legislation/Cases/References
1.

State

There is no State-wide legislation that recognizes same-sex partners for any purpose [R1.3].

On 11 February 2013, Sen. Juan Hinojosa introduced Senate Bill 480 (Relating to the formation of a civil union between persons of the same sex; providing penalties). To become law (1) it has to pass the House, (2) the Texas constitution has to be amended, (3) the Governor must sign it and (4) voters must approve it [L1.2], [R1.1].

2.

County

On 30 October 2012, the Dallas County Commissioners Court voted 3–2 to approve a subsidy for the purchase or continuation of medical insurance which will be offered to any county employee's same-sex and opposite-sex partner and children as long as they provide evidence that they have lived together for at least six months or more [R2.3].

On 13 August 2012, El Paso County Commissioners voted to allow health benefits to same-sex partners for county employees at an estimated cost of just under $24,000 per year [R2.2].

On 17 December 1999, Travis County reportedly had apparently been accepting sworn "declarations of domestic partnership" however, Attorney General John Cornyn ruled County clerks were not authorized to file "same-sex marriage" agreements from gay and lesbian couples [R2.1].

3.

Cities & Towns

On 15 September 2010, San Antonio passed a new 2012 budget 8–3 that included domestic partner benefits for city employees [R3.6].

On 14 June 2011, El Paso City Council reinstated health insurance benefits to gay and unmarried couples as well as other current and former city workers who were the unintended targets of a voter-approved ordinance [R3.5].

On 02 November 2010, an ordinance was passed by 55% of voters, stripping El Paso domestic partner benefits from gay workers, effective 01 January 2011. The ordinance may have also taken benefits away from retired police officers and elected officials [R3.4].

See also 4. Courts & Tribunals [R4.4]

On 02 November 2009, the city of Austin announced that it will start offering COBRA-like (The Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) benefits to the same-sex domestic partners of city employees, giving them access to health care insurance in the event of job loss, divorce, or death [R3.3].

On 30 July 2009, El Paso City Council voted 6–1 to domestic partner extend health benefits to gay and unmarried heterosexual partners of municipal employees [R3.2].

Dallas reportedly provides domestic partners benefits to their employees [R3.2].

In November 2001, voters in Houston, approved amending the city charter to prohibit the nation's fourth-largest city from offering benefits to domestic partners of gay and lesbian municipal employees [R3.1].

4.

Courts & Tribunals

On 23 May 2011, US District Court Judge Frank Montalvo ruled the ordinance intended to deny health benefits for same sex and unwed partners of El Paso city employees will stand. That means everyone who is not a city employee, including appointed judges, will no longer have benefits [R4.4].


On 03 March 2003, Judge Tom Mulvaney signed a divorce decree for Russell Smith, 26, and John Anthony, 34, a Beaumont couple granted a license of civil union in Vermont in February 2002 [R4.3].

On 26 March 2003, the Texas Attorney General filed a general petition in the District Court arguing that the divorce is unconstitutional and never should have been granted [R4.2].

On 31 March 2003, State District Judge Tom Mulvaney dismissed the divorce filing after Russell Smith, 36, requested his petition for dissolution be discharged [R4.1].

  Contributor: Helene G. Parker
R1.3 Contributor: Helene G. Parker
L1.2 Texas Legislature: SB 480: Relating to the formation of a civil union between persons of the same sex; providing penalties (Accessed 14 FEB 13)
R1.1 Yahoo! News: Bill Introduced in Texas Legislature to Permit Same-Sex Civil Unions 13 FEB 13
R2.3 Huffington Post: Dallas County Approves Domestic Partner Insurance Subsidy That Includes Same-Sex Couples 31 OCT 12
R2.2 KTSM: County Approves Same-Sex Benefits 13 AUG 12
R2.1 Houston Chronicle: Attorney General Cornyn Strikes Gay and Lesbian Marriage Pacts 18 DEC 99
R3.6 The Advocate: San Antonio Votes to Provide DP Benefits to City Employees 19 SEP 11
R3.5 Westport News: El Paso restores gay and unwed couples' benefits 14 JUN 11
R3.4 The Advocate: Mistake in El Paso Antigay Law 03 JAN 11
R3.3 The Advocate: Austin Adds COBRA to DP Benefits 03 NOV 09
R3.2 Speak Equal: Domestic Partners Receive Health Care Benefits In El Paso 31 JUL 09
R3.1 Associated Press: Five Cities Vote on Gay-Rights Issues 07 NOV 01
R4.4 KVIA / ABC7: Reaction From Those Losing City Benefits Through Ordinance 24 MAY 11
R4.3 Associated Press: Texas Judge Grants Same-Sex Divorce 07 MAR 03
R4.2 Beaumont Enterprise: No Gay Marriage, No Gay Divorce, AG says 27 MAR 03
R4.1 Associated Press: Houston Judge Dismisses Gay Divorce Case 02 APR 03
Discrimination Legislation/Cases/References
1.

State

There is no State-wide law protecting against discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation [R1.2].

See also: "Texas – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination" [R1.1].

2.

County

On 26 April 2011, Dallas County court of commissioners added sexual orientation to the county's workplace nondiscrimination policy [R2.1].

On 22 March 2011, the Dallas County court of commissioners added sexual orientation to the county's nondiscrimination policy [R2.1].

3.

Cities & Towns

On 25 March 2010, Houston mayor Annise Parker issued an executive order banning discrimination against LGBT city employees [R3.7].

In August 2007, High Point Church in Arlington banned the funeral service of former US Navy serviceman Cecil Sinclair when they reviewed photos of Sinclair's memorial service which depicted aspects of his same sex relationship [R3.6].

In April 2003, El Paso City Council expanded its anti-discrimination ordinance to make discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity unlawful [R3.5].

On 08 May 2002, Dallas City Council voted almost unanimously to amend the Dallas City Code extending protection from discrimination on the basis of "sexual orientation" (defined to include "real or perceived gender identity") in employment, housing and public accommodations to gay, lesbian, bi-sexual and transgender residents of Dallas [R3.4].

In July 2001, the Houston City Council voted 10–4 for a law that will protect gay city employees, prohibiting discrimination by the city on the basis of sexual orientation, and discrimination over such factors as race and gender [R3.3].

In 1984, Houston's city council banned discrimination based on sexual orientation in city hiring, promotion, and contracting. Voters repealed the ordinance the following year. Mayor Lee Brown reinstated the policy by executive order in 1998 and the Texas Supreme Court dismissed a challenge to the policy in June 2001, letting the executive order stand [R3.2].

In September 2000, Fort Worth's anti-discrimination ordinance covers age, color, creed, disability, family status, gender, national origin, race, religion and from 26 September 2000 now sexual preference [R3.1].

4.

Schools & Colleges

On 17 August 2010, St. Vincent's School in Bedford refused to enrol the daughter of Jill and Tracy Harrison, a lesbian couple married in Canada [R4.1].

R1.2 Contributor: Helene G. Parker
R1.1 Williams Institute: Texas – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination PDF 210.44kb, SEP 09
R2.1 The Advocate: Trans Protections Approved in Dallas 27 APR 11
R3.7 The Advocate: Parker Signs Discrimination Order 02 APR 10
R3.6 MCV: Church Bans Gay Funeral 16 AUG 07
R3.5 El Paso Times: City Amends Ordinance on Discrimination 09 APR 03
R3.4 Texas Triangle: City of Dallas Passes GLBT Non-Discrimination Ordinance 10 MAY 02
Dallas Morning News: Anti-discrimination Law OK'd by Council 08 MAY 02
R3.3 Houston Chronicle: Council Votes to Ban Discrimination by City Against Gay Employees 25 JUL 01
R3.2 The Advocate: "Texas Court Stands by Antidiscrimination Law" 23-25 JUN 01
R3.1 PlanetOut: Fort Worth, Texas Adopts Rights 27 SEP 00
R4.1 The Advocate: Texas School Denies Child of Gay Moms 21 AUG 10
Estates, Inheritance, Property, Succession, Wills Legislation/Cases/References
1.

State

In Texas, there is no legislation regulating the division of property when same-sex couples split up [R1.2].

In such instances, a property dispute would be resolved by mediation and the application principles of contract and trust law.

Same-sex couples should therefore put in place a partnership and property agreement prior to entering into a relationship [R1.1].

1.

Courts & Tribunals

On 24 May 2011, 329th Wharton County District Judge Randy Clapp issued a draft order finding that "any marriage between Thomas Araguz and [male to female transgender] Nikki Araguz was void as a matter of law" and Thomas "was not married at the time of his death" and accordingly Araguz is not entitled to inheritance of $600,000 in death benefits and assets [R2.3].

Previously:

On 20 May 2011, State District Judge Randy Clapp was expected to rule on the transgender death benefits claim of widow Nikki Araguz in a week or so [R2.2].

On 23 July 2010, transgender widow Nikki Araguz was temporarily barred from collecting or spending death benefits from her husband, a firefighter who was killed in the line of duty earlier that month [R2.1].

See further under MARRIAGE: Courts & Tribunals

R1.2 Contributor: Helene G. Parker
R1.1 See: GayLawNet - Information - Partners
R2.3 Jezebel: Judge Decides Transgender Widow's Marriage Was Illegal 26 MAY 11
R2.2 ABC13.com: Widow's death benefit battle back in court 20 MAY 11
R2.1 Dallas Voice: Judge bars fallen firefighter's transgender widow from collecting, spending death benefits 23 JUL 10
Gender Identity, Intersex,
Transgender, Transexual

[?]
Legislation/Cases/References
1.

State

There is no State-wide law protecting against discrimination on the basis of gender identity [R1.3].


On 14 May 2013, the Senate passed SB 1218, a Bill that would prevent people from obtaining a licence with a document that lacks photographic identification and dramatically affect transgender residents seeking a marriage licence. The Bill still needs to pass both a House panel and the full chamber by Tuesday 21 May [L1.2], [R1.1].

2.

County

On 26 April 2011, the Commissioners Court added "transgender, gender identity, and gender expression" to the county's existing laws against workplace discrimination [R2.1].

3.

Cities & Towns

Dallas, Fort Worth [R3.1], El Paso and Houston City Councils have anti-discrimination codes enacted.

4.

Courts & Tribunals

On 26 May 2011, 329th Wharton County District Judge Randy Clapp signed the order voiding the marriage between Thomas Araguz and Nikke Araguz [C4.5], [R4.4].

On 24 May 2011, 329th Wharton County District Judge Randy Clapp issued a draft order finding that "any marriage between Thomas Araguz and [male to female transgender] Nikki Araguz was void as a matter of law" and Thomas "was not married at the time of his death" [R4.3].

On 27 October 1999, the Texas Court of Appeals concluded that a male-to-female transsexual: "as a matter of law, Christie Littleton is a male. As a male, Christie cannot be married to another male. Her marriage to Jonathon was invalid, and she cannot bring a cause of action as his surviving spouse" [C4.2].

The Texas Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal of that ruling [R4.1].

R1.3 Contributor: Helene G. Parker
L1.2 Bill: SB 1218 Relating to the proof of an applicant's identity and age required for the issuance of a marriage license 06 MAR 13
R1.1 PinkNews: Anti-trans marriage law gains Senate approval 16 MAY 13
R2.1 The Advocate: Trans Protections Approved in Dallas 27 APR 11
R3.1 Texas Triangle: City of Dallas Passes GLBT Non-Discrimination Ordinance 10 MAY 02
C4.5 329th District Court: Order Granting Administrator's and Intervenor's Motions for Summary Judgment PDF 109.96kb, 26 MAY 11
R4.4 Houston Chronicle: Texas judge voids transgender widow's marriage 31 MAY 11
R4.3 Jezebel: Judge Decides Transgender Widow's Marriage Was Illegal 26 MAY 11
C4.2 Press for Change: Littleton v. Prange, 9 S.W. 3d 223 (1999)
R4.1 GenderPAC National News: GPAC Applauds MD Recognition of Sex Change 18 FEB 03

GayLawNet® "Exclusive" Sponsorship of this page IS available
Hate Crimes Legislation/Cases/References
See also: [VIOLENCE] [WRONGFUL DEATH]
1.

State

Texas Statutes, Code of Criminal Procedure, Chapter 42. Judgment and Sentence [L1.3]

Art. 42.014. Finding that Offence was Committed because of Bias or Prejudice

(a) In the trial of an offense under Title 5, Penal Code, or Section 28.02, 28.03, or 28.08, Penal Code, the judge shall make an affirmative finding of fact and enter the affirmative finding in the judgment of the case if at the guilt or innocence phase of the trial, the judge or the jury, whichever is the trier of fact, determines beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant intentionally selected the person against whom the offense was committed or intentionally selected property damaged or affected as a result of the offense because of the defendant ’s bias or prejudice against a group identified by race, color, disability, religion, national origin or ancestry, age, gender, or sexual preference […] Effective 01 September 2001.


On 11 May 2001, Governor Rick Perry signed the James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Act into law, creating harsher penalties for those who commit crimes against members of the gay, lesbian, bi-sexual and transgender community and other minority groups [R1.2].

On 07 May 2001, the Senate voted 20–10 to approve the bill that increases the penalties for committing a crime based on hatred or bias [R1.1].

L1.3 Texas Statutes: Chapter 42 (Accessed 14 JUN 09)
R1.2 Associated Press: Texas Gov. Signs Hate-Crimes Bill 11 MAY 01
R1.1 Austin American-Statesman: Texas Senate Passes Hate-Crimes Bill 08 MAY 01
HIV Aids Legislation/Cases/References
1.

State

The Health & Safety Code Chapter 81.102 [L1.1] provides that –

"A person may not require another person to undergo a medical procedure or test designed to determine if a person has HIV/Aids unless:

the medical procedure is required under the Code of Criminal Procedure Articles 21.31 or 81.050; or
the test is necessary for a bona fide occupational qualification and there is not a less discriminatory means of satisfying the occupational qualification (An employer who alleges that a test is necessary as a bina fide occupational qualification has the burden of proving that allegation); or
to screen blood or tissues to determine suitability for donation
[...]

The Health & Safety Code Chapter 81.103 [L1.1] provides that –

HIV/AIDS test results are confidential. It is a class A misdemeanor to release test results:

except in certain proscribed circumstances; or
where the person tested or a person authorized to consent to the test on the person's behalf may voluntarily authorize release or disclose the test result.
However, the authorization must be in writing, signed by the person tested and must state the person or class of persons to whom the test results may be released or disclosed.
  Contributor: Helene G. Parker
2.

Courts & Tribunals

In 1996, a judge ordered a man with AIDS to obtain written consent from all future sex partners as part of his probation in a car theft conviction. The form reads in part, "Although I realise I am potentially risking my own life, I nonetheless desire to engage in sexual relations with the abovenamed individual" [R2.1].

L1.1 Texas Statutes: Chapter 81.102
R2.1 Melbourne Star Observer: Texas Justice? 15 MAR 96
Homosexuality, Sodomy Legislation/Cases/References
1.

State

On 26 June 2003, following the US Supreme Court ruling in Lawrence v. Texas, consensual sex between same-sex couples became lawful [C2.8].

The same-sex sodomy law remains on the statute books in Texas, despite the June 2003 ruling in the US Supreme Court.

See: 2. Courts & Tribunals

The now unconstitutional Section 21.06 of the Texas Penal Code, the "homosexual conduct" statute, which was passed in 1974, states that:

(a) person commits an offense if he engages in deviate sexual intercourse with another individual of the same sex.

(b) An offense under this section is a Class C misdemeanor [L1.4].

The Texas Health & Safety Code Chapter 85.007 authorizes Texas agencies to create Education Programs for Minors ("persons younger than 18 years of age") which programs shall

"(2) state that homosexual conduct is not an acceptable lifestyle and is a criminal offense under Section 21.06, Penal Code" [L1.3]


On 17 April 2013, the Senate Criminal Justice Committee voted 5–0 to repeal the state's anti-gay sodomy law, a decade after the U.S. Supreme Court declared it unconstitutional. The bill was sent to the full Senate for a vote [L1.2], [R1.1].

2.

Courts & Tribunals

On 26 June 2003, the US Supreme Court ruled in Lawrence v. Texas that the Texas Penal Code, Section 21.06 was unconstitutional , Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U. S. 558 (2003) [C2.8].

In the 6–3 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that the Texas law against "deviate sexual intercourse with another individual of the same sex" is an unconstitutional violation of privacy [R2.8].

The ruling reverses course from a ruling 17 years ago that states could punish homosexuals for what such laws historically called deviant sex.

Previously:

In December 2002, the US Supreme Court announced it would consider whether states can punish homosexuals for having sex. The case in effect was a test of the constitutionality of sodomy laws in 13 states. The justices reviewed the prosecution of two men under a 28-year-old Texas law making it a crime to engage in same-sex intercourse [R2.7].

On 17 July 2002, Lambda Legal filed an appeal in the US Supreme Court on consitutional grounds [R2.6]. It needed four justices to accept the case, five to decide it [R2.5].

On 17 April 2002, the nine judges on the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals refused to consider an appeal, which was filed by a national gay rights group called Lambda Legal [R2.4].

On 15 March 2001, the 9-member 14th court of appeals upheld 7–2 the state's sodomy law [R2.3].

On 08 June 2000, the court of appeals ruled 2–1 that the state's anti-sodomy law unconstitutional, throwing out the criminal case against two Houston men arrested in 1998 for having sex with each other [R2.2].

In November 1998, two were charged under the state's sodomy statute for engaging in consensual sex in a private residence [R2.1].

L1.4 Texas Penal Code: Sec. 21.06. Homosexual Conduct
L1.3 Texas Health & Safety Code: Sec. 85.007. Education Programs for Minors
L1.2 State Legislature: Senate Bill 538 (Accessed 18 APR 13)
R1.1 Houston Chronicle: Texas Senate committee votes to repeal anti-gay law 17 APR 13
C2.8 US Supreme Court: Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U S 558 (2003), 26 JUN 03
R2.8 Associated Press: Supreme Court Strikes Down Gay Sex Ban 26 JUN 03
R2.7 Associated Press: High Court to Review Sodomy Laws 02 DEC 02
R2.6 The Advocate: Top Court May Review Texas Sodomy Law 17 JUL 02
R2.5 Houston Chronicle: Court may review Texas sodomy law 03 NOV 02
R2.4 The Advocate: Texas Sodomy Case May Go to Supreme Court 19 APR 02
Houston Chronicle: Court Upholds Sodomy Ban in Refusing to Hear Appeal 19 APR 02
R2.3 The Advocate: Texas Sodomy Law Upheld 17-19 MAR 01
R2.2 Austin American-Stateman: Appeals Court Rejects State's Sodomy Law 09 JUN 00
R2.1 Los Angeles Times: Legal Assaults Against States' Anti-Sodomy Laws Multiply 03 DEC 98
Houston Chronicle: Two Men Charged Under State's Sodomy Law 05 NOV 98
Marriage Legislation/Cases/References
1.

State

Texas Statutes Family Code, Title 1. The Marriage Relationship, Subtitle A. Marriage [L1.12].

Chapter 2. The Marriage Relationship, Subchapter A. Application for Marriage Licence

Sec. 2.001. Marriage Licence. (a) A man and a woman desiring to enter into a ceremonial marriage must obtain a marriage license from the county clerk of any county of this state.

(b) license may not be issued for the marriage of persons of the same sex.

The Texas Constitution, Article 1. Bill of Rights, Section 32. Marriage [L1.11].

"MARRIAGE. (a) Marriage in this state shall consist only of the union of one man and one woman.

(b) This state or a political subdivision of this state may not create or recognize any legal status identical or similar to marriage.

(Added Nov. 8, 2005)"


On 14 May 2013, the Senate passed SB 1218, a Bill that would prevent people from obtaining a licence with a document that lacks photographic identification and dramatically affect transgender residents seeking a marriage licence. The Bill still needs to pass both a House panel and the full chamber by Tuesday 21 May [L1.10], [R1.9].

On 03 May 2010, a trans woman who was born male and her longtime girlfriend were legally married in San Antonio after previously being denied a marriage license in El Paso [R1.8].

In November 2009, Houston attorney Barbara Ann Radnofsky, a Texas candidate for attorney general, argued that an amendment made to the state's constitution (§32(b) above) to ban gay marriages has actually made all marriages illegal [R1.7].

On 03 April 2003, the Senate committee on State Affairs approved SB 7, which would ban the state from recognizing same-sex civil unions [R1.6].

In November 2002, House Bill 38 known as the defense of marriage act would if passed ban the state from recognizing same sex marriages or civil unions. The bill has failed at least three times before [R1.5].

In May 2002, the Epstein Chapel of Temple Shalom Jewish synagogue in North Dallas carried out its first blessing of a same-sex union with Cantor Don Croll officiating [R1.4]

On 21 May 2001, legislation banning same-sex marriages or civil unions performed in other states died in the bill-scheduling House Calendars Committee, the panel's chairman said [R1.3].

On 02 April 2001, the house of representatives voted unanimously Monday to approve an amendment to a bill on marital property laws that bans recognition of same-sex marriages [R1.2].

In August 2000, Bexar County reportedly was to issue a marriage license to two Houston women because one of the women is a transsexual and is considered a man under Texas law [R1.1].

See also: 2. Courts & Tribunals

2.

Courts & Tribunals

In late November 2011, District Court Judge Lori Chrisman Hockett refused to nullify the marriage of James Lee Scott and Rebecca Louise Robertson. Robertson had sought the nullification on the basis that Scott was born biologically female and Texas does not recognize same-sex marriage. She instead ruled that their breakup should proceed as a divorce – which will allow Scott, who is physically disabled from scoliosis, a chance at a fair share of the couple’s property [C2.17], [R2.16].

On 14 November 2011, Nikki Araguz, the transgender widow of a Texas firefighter, lodged an appeal against Wharton County District Judge Randy Clapp's decision that found their marriage invalid and denied her his death benefits [R2.15].

On 26 May 2011, 329th Wharton County District Judge Randy Clapp signed the order voiding the marriage between Thomas Araguz and Nikke Araguz [C2.14], [R2.13].

On 24 May 2011, 329th Wharton County District Judge Randy Clapp issued a draft order finding that "any marriage between Thomas Araguz and [male to female transgender] Nikki Araguz was void as a matter of law" and Thomas "was not married at the time of his death" [R2.12].

On 07 January 2011, Justice Diane Henson in the appellate court, joined by Justices Woodie Jones and David Puryear, ruled that Attorney General Greg Abbott may not intervene in a Travis County same-sex divorce case, a finding that lets stand for now the divorce of Angelique Naylor and Sabina Daly who were married out of state but does not affect Texas' ban on gay marriage [C2.11], [R2.10].

In December 2010, a gay couple in Texas that were married via Skype last month by a DC celebrant to circumvent Texas same-sex marriage laws were notified in a letter from the DC Superior Court that their union is invalid [R2.9].

On 31 August 2010, the 5th Texas Court of Appeals ruled that a Dallas district court judge didn't have the authority to hear a divorce case involving two Dallas men who married in Massachusetts in 2006. Gay couples legally married in other states cannot get a divorce in Texas, where same-sex marriage is banned [R2.8].

On 21 April 2010, the Attorney General's Office argued before the three-judge 5th Texas Court of Appeals panel that as same-sex marriage isn't recognized in Texas, divorce cannot be granted and such unions can only be voided and that the parties lack standing to file a divorce case because they're not married [R2.7].

In April 2010, Texas attorney general Greg Abbott said he would appeal a second gay divorce granted to Angelique Naylor and Sabina Daly in order to protect heterosexual marriage in the state [R2.6].

In March 2010, District Judge Scott Jenkins in Austin upheld a divorce granted to Angelique Naylor and Sabina Daly who married in Massachusetts in 2004 [R2.5].

In February 2010, the attorney general Greg Abbott intervened in a same-sex divorce case, saying that two women married in Massachusetts cannot divorce in Texas because state law defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman [R2.4].

On 01 October 2009, Dallas state District Judge Tena Callahan ruled that two men married in Massachusetts could be divorced, notwithstanding a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage. Judge Callahan declared that the state's ban on same-sex marriage violated equal protection under the law [R2.3].

On 31 March 2003, District Judge Tom Mulvaney dismissed a divorce request filed by two men who obtained a civil union in Vermont last year and were attempting to have it dissolved in Texas after Russell Smith, 36, requested his petition for dissolution be discharged.

On 26 March 2003, a general petition filed in the district court by Attorney General Greg Abbott argued that because Texas doesn't recognize same-sex marriages, the recent same-sex divorce of Beaumont men John Anthony and Russell Smith never should have happened [R2.2].

On 03 March 2003, Judge Tom Mulvaney signed a divorce decree Monday for Russell Smith, 26, and John Anthony, 34, a Beaumont couple granted a license of civil union in Vermont in February 2002 [R2.1].

On 27 October 1999, the Texas Court of Appeals concluded that a male-to-female transsexual "as a matter of law, Christie Littleton is a male. As a male, Christie cannot be married to another male. Her marriage to Jonathon was invalid, and she cannot bring a cause of action as his surviving spouse" [C2.1].

L1.12 Texas Code: Section 2.001 (Accessed 14 JUN 09)
L1.11 The Texas Constitution: Article 1. Bill of Rights, Section 32 Marriage (Accessed 05 OCT 09
L1.10 Bill: SB 1218 Relating to the proof of an applicant's identity and age required for the issuance of a marriage license 06 MAR 13
R1.9 PinkNews: Anti-trans marriage law gains Senate approval 16 MAY 13
R1.8 The Advocate: Trans Woman Weds Girlfriend in Texas 05 MAY 10
R1.7 The Advocate: Is Anyone in Texas Actually Married? 19 NOV 09
R1.6 Associated Press: Senate Committee Approves Ban on Same-sex Marriage 03 APR 03
R1.5 KXAN-TV: Same Sex Marriage Bill Battle Begins 14 NOV 02
R1.4 Dallas Morning News: Same-Sex Union is First For Temple 22 JUN 02
R1.3 Fort Worth Star-Telegram: Legislative Briefs - Same-Sex Marriage Ban Derailed 22 MAY 01
R1.2 The Advocate: Anti-Gay-Marriage Amendment Passes Texas House 05 APR 00
R1.1 Advocate: Same-sex Couple to Get Texas Marriage License 31 AUG 00
C2.17 In the District Court 255th Judicial District of Dallas County: Rebecca Louise Robertson v. James Lee Scott Case No. DF-10-16083
R2.16 The Advocate: Judge Rules Texas Transgender Man's Marriage Valid 02 DEC 11
R2.15 The Advocate: Texas Transgender Widow Appeals Benefits Decision 15 NOV 11
C2.14 329th District Court: Order Granting Administrator's and Intervenor's Motions for Summary Judgment PDF 109.96kb, 26 MAY 11
R2.13 Houston Chronicle: Texas judge voids transgender widow's marriage 31 MAY 11
R2.12 Jezebel: Judge Decides Transgender Widow's Marriage Was Illegal 26 MAY 11
C2.11 Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District: State of Texas v. Angelique S. Naylor and Sabina Daly No. 03-10-00237-CV, 07 JAN 11
R2.10 The Advocate: Travis County gay divorce stands under appellate ruling 07 JAN 11
R2.9 PinkPaper: Skype gay marriage deemed invalid by courts 05 DEC 10
R2.8 The Washington Post: Court says gay couples can't divorce in Texas 31 AUG 10
R2.7 365Gay.com: Texas court hears state’s appeal in gay divorce 22 APR 10
R2.6 PinkNews.co.uk: Texas attorney general to appeal second gay divorce 20 APR 10
R2.5 The Advocate: "Gay" Divorce in Texas Upheld 01 APR 10
R2.4 The Advocate: Texas AG Intervenes in Gay Divorce 16 FEB 10
R2.3 The Advocate: Texas Judge OK's Gay Divorce 01 OCT 09
R2.2 Beaumont Enterprise: No Gay Marriage, No Gay Divorce, AG says 27 MAR 03
R2.1 Associated Press: Texas Judge Grants Same-Sex Divorce 07 MAR 03
C2.1 Press for Change: Littleton v. Prange, 9 S.W. 3d 223 (1999)
Parenting, Adoption, Fostering Legislation/Cases/References
1.

State

In Texas, gay couples are able to adopt children jointly [R1.4].

  • A suit terminating the biological parent's rights must first be instituted before a suit for adoption can take place.
  • An adoption case may be instituted as a one-step procedure by joining the termination and adoption causes of action, or by a two-step procedure in which the separate adoption suit follows a termination suit.
  • As a general rule, it is advisable to keep the procedures for termination and adoption separate.
  • Texas judges will not grant a termination of parental rights until there is a parent who is willing to adopt the child. Texas Family Code, Chapter 162 [L1.5]

Single persons and same-sex couples can foster children however if the the question of an applicant's sexuality is raised, the court may refuse to make an order [R1.4].


In December 2002, House Bill 194, from Rep. Robert Talton, R-Pasadena, if passed, would require that the Protective and Regulatory Service, which approves foster parents, ask applicants if they are homosexual. If they answer yes, they would be disqualified. If no, a "reasonable investigation" will be conducted to ensure they are, indeed, heterosexual [R1.3].

In December 1998, Rep. Warren Chisum, R-Pampa, a West Texas legislator, sponsored a bill that would ban gays and lesbians from becoming foster parents or adopting children in state custody [R1.2].

In 1998, a Texas social worker was reprimanded and demoted for removing a foster child from the home of a lesbian couple seeking to adopt him [R1.1].

2.

Courts & Tribunals

On 03 May 1999, the Plano-based Liberty Legal Institute, which focuses on family and constitutional issues, filed the motion on behalf of Rebecca Bledsoe, a Child Protective Services supervisor who said she was demoted after removing a 3-year-old boy from a lesbian couple's home in Dallas two years ago [R2.1].

L1.5 Texas Family Code: Chapter 162. Adoption
R1.4 Contributor: Helene G. Parker
R1.3 The Daily Texan: Bill Targets Gay Foster Parents 04 DEC 02
R1.2 Houston Chronicle: Bill Would Ban Gays From Adopting Children 10 DEC 98
R1.1 Scripps Howard News Service: Child Adoptions by Homosexuals Ignite Legislative Fights 24 FEB 99
R2.1 San Antonio Express-News: Group Asks Judge to Halt Gay, Lesbian Adoptions 04 MAY 99
Violence: Bullying, Domestic Violence, Harassment, Vilification Legislation/Cases/References
1.

State

On 17 June 2011, Governor Perry signed anti-bullying bill HB 1942 (effective immediately) which doesn't include specific protections for LGBT youth but for the first time requires school districts to adopt anti-bullying policies and adds bullying by electronic means to the state's definition [R1.3]. Section 9 provides that the Act's provisions apply beginning with the 2012-2013 school year on 01 September 2012.

As at December 2010, current Texas law mandates that schools include language prohibiting bullying in student codes of conduct, however there is little on the books saying how schools should go about doing that and even less to give a clear definition of what constitutes bullying [R1.2].


Any unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, or other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature, submission to which is made a term or condition of a person's exercise or enjoyment of any right, privilege, power, or immunity, either explicitly or implicitly constitutes "sexual harassment" [R1.1].

Sexual harassment in employment situations, either by someone of the opposite sex or of the same sex, is prohibited in Texas.

It is a class A misdemeanor for a public official to subject another individual to sexual harassment.


In Texas, there is no anti-vilification legislation [R1.1].

R1.3 Dallas Voice: Governor Perry signs anti-bullying bill 18 JUN 11
R1.2 The Advocate: Texas to Define Bullying in Schools 07 DEC 10
R1.1 Contributor: Helene G. Parker
R1.1 Contributor: Helene G. Parker
Wrongful Death Legislation/Cases/References
1.

State

Texas Statutes, Civil Practice and Remedies Code, Title 4. Liability in Tort, Chapter 71. Wrongful Death [L1.1] provides that —

Sec. 71.004. Benefitting from and bringing action. (a) An action to recover damages as provided by this subchapter is for the exclusive benefit of the surviving spouse, children, and parents of the deceased.

2.

Courts & Tribunals

On 26 May 2011, Judge Randy Clapp ruled that the surviving transgender widow of a firefighter killed in the line of duty is not entitled to death benefits because she was born male [C2.2], [R2.1].

L1.1 Texas Statutes: Chapter 71. Wrongful Death PDF 55.34kb
C2.2 In the Estate of Thomas Trevino Araguz III, No. 44,575 (329th Dist. Ct., Wharton Co., Texas)
R2.1 Lesbian/Gay Law Notes: Widow not entitled to death benefits because she was born male PDF 433.08kb, MAY 11 at page 111

GayLawNet® "Exclusive" Sponsorship of this page IS available